Dear Mary,
Thank you for your reply.
It is unnecessary to reply with regard to clarifying our discussion of point and module numbers, I realize that points alone can be unique identifiers and that is all that is required to make code work.
I would like to thank you for your efforts, they are appreciated. I have read some working SDK code and I believe the task of setting a digital point to an output point is not as simple as one would expect. The working code that is the compatible for the old unit does some parsing of data.
I wrote a program in another environment using third party software that can accomplish my tasks. However, I find my "workaround" to be very "kludgy" and I would like to develop my code the proper way working within the C++ environment. Therefore, I am still looking forward to proper fix for this problem.
I actually looked over the list about a week ago with someone from tech support. There was no one located near my location in NY. It would be more economical for the company to just purchase a later version of the "opto" brain unit. It is possible that they may move in that direction. The problem that I am running into is quite common in the tech world, old hardware and new software, just not getting along .
Hopefully, some old code snippets might just save the day.