Thanks for the heads up @philip
I ran it past the software guys and sure enough, the PR1 and SNAP-PAC use the same method to covert, so they match up.
SoftPAC on the other hand uses the Microsoft method and returns 3 digits because reasons only known to Microsoft…
Ahh, so it is windows that is the issue - that makes sense, I was comparing what SoftPAC returned to the EPIC. I must of never ran this particular code on a SNAP-PAC.
Would it be possible to add a note in the help docs to warn our future selves?